Revised Issues and Concerns Paper on Taxation

Regina, SK, October 30, 2003

There are two reasons for governments to collect taxes:

  1. Tax  revenue makes it possible to provide the services that are needed by everyone  from time to time: health care, education, security (courts, police, army),  transportation (air, rail, auto, bus), regulators (food, drugs, water, air,  waste disposal), social services (child care, care of the handicapped and  elderly, care of those who cannot work), pension and unemployment benefits,  recreation (parks, libraries, museums, art galleries). Although we don’t all  need all of these services all of the time these social supports are  sufficiently universal that we recognize that our way of life is more rewarding  and productive when we share in their provision.
  2. Tax revenue makes it  possible to redistribute wealth so that everyone has access to the services  listed above. This is much more important than most people realize.  “Considerable evidence has emerged recently showing how population health is  influenced by social/economic relations within a society; the psychosocial  impact of these relations; and by experiences during sensitive periods in human  development. . . . Analyses of gradient effects show that those countries with  relatively equal income distributions are healthier than those with relatively  unequal distributions, and that those countries which were able to preserve or  increase their level of income equality during the 1970s and 1980s enjoyed  greater gains in live expectancy than those countries with increasingly unequal  income distributions. These gradient effects were confirmed internationally [as  well as] in a study of the fifty states in the USA ; those states with higher  levels of income equality had longer life expectancies, independently of their  average income.” (Hertzman, Clyde , (1999). Population health and human  development. In D. P. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.) Developmental health and  the wealth of nations: Social, Biological, and Educational Dynamics. New York :  Guilford Press.)

There are several forms of taxation and various levels  of government tend to have jurisdiction over various forms:

Federal  government: income tax, corporate taxes, tariffs and duties, inheritance taxes,  sales tax (GST)
Provincial government: income tax, resource royalties, user  fees, sales tax (PST)
Municipal government: property tax, local business tax,  user fees

The Federal government has the greatest taxing power and their  tax policies have the greatest influence on the health of the economy. Income  tax is the most “progressive” of all forms of taxation, at least it can be. In  the last decade the progressivity of the system has been corrupted as the number  of “steps” on the tax form were reduced from 10 to 3. Other corruptions of a  progressive system include tax loopholes such as extravagant expense accounts,  the dividend tax credit and corporate capital gains.

Another major  source of federal tax revenue should be corporate taxes; however, federal policy  has changed the distribution of individual vs corporate contributions. In 1950  income taxes from individuals amounted to $3.3 billion and corporate taxes  totalled $3.2 billion, an almost equal split. In 1995 taxes collected from  individuals amounted to $85 billion and from corporations only $10.9 billion. In  other words, the corporate contribution declined from about 50% to about 11%.  The shift in burden has fallen mainly on the lower and middle  classes.

General recommendations:

  1. The federal government  can create a more progressive tax system, i.e., require the wealthy to pay  their fair share.
  2. Eliminate tax loopholes.
  3. Increase corporate taxes.
  4. Increase resource royalties
  5. Re-instate estate taxes
  6. Eliminate tax conventions with countries that are tax havens
  7. The federal government has been cutting corporate taxes and downloading  the corresponding responsibility for providing services and maintaining  infrastructure to municipal governments, both urban and rural. Local governments  have no way to make up the loss in revenue; therefore, SSM believes that the  federal government should significantly increase transfers to provincial and  municipal
  8. The Boughen Report on Educational Funding (Jan, 2004) recommends that the  PST be increased to offset a decrease in property taxes. Property taxes have  been seen as discriminatory to land owners in rural areas. The SSM recognizes  that both property and sales taxes are regressive forms of taxation in that they  place a disproportionate burden on low-income earners in comparison with high  income earners; therefore SSM would support an increase in provincial income tax  to offset a decrease in property taxes.

Of interest to Seniors:
(a)  reduce the effect of Bracket Creep by indexing tax brackets to inflation,
(b)  restore the full amount of the tax credits which seniors receive based on age  and retirement rather than retaining the current 17% credit limit,
(c)  eliminate the clawback on OAS and the GIS,
(d) OAS should be paid to all  age-eligible citizens and taxed at the same rate as allother income; tax back,  don’t clawback.
(e) fully index OAS and GIS to the actual inflation rate and  to the cost of living index,
(f) increase the basic exemption or give a  special tax credit for low income earners,
(g) increase tax credits for home  care expenses to reflect the true cost of service.

Property tax is  regressive in the sense that the value of a capital asset often bears little or  no relationship to the income it can generate. In some respects it has a  negative impact on a community because a homeowner who improves his property  then has a higher assessment which means a larger tax bill.

Municipal  governments, both urban and rural, at present are dependent on property taxes to  support local infrastructure such as streets, roads, sewer and water, libraries,  parks and recreational facilities. However, the biggest draw on property tax, at  least in Saskatchewan , is K – 12 education. The contribution of the provincial  government varies from about 20% to 40% of the cost depending on the assessment  of a school division; the remainder is paid through local property taxes. The  Saskatchewan School Trustees Association strongly supports the use of property  taxes because it gives local people some control over the quality of education  their children receive; however, the SSTA supports a 40-60 split with the  provincial government covering 60% of the cost of education. Most provincial  governments in Canada now collect property taxes which then go into general  revenue. Provinces like Alberta , B.C., and Ontario then give grants to school  districts as they choose, but school districts do not have the power to collect  taxes to cover costs of their schools when the provincial governments cut the  grants. This policy has proved very destructive to public education in those  provinces.

Urban and rural school districts need to be treated fairly in  terms of assessments and mill rates and the provincial share of funding. This  whole area requires public discussion.

Provincial governments rely on  royalties on resources such as oil, potash, uranium, pulp and paper, etc. In  Saskatchewan these royalties have been cut drastically in the past two decades.  This policy has seriously affected provincial revenue. The result is that  provincial transfers to municipalities and school districts has suffered. We  have the effects in the quality of our roads, water purification, environmental  standards, and the cost of education. We recommend that these royalties be  increased to 1980s levels.

Sales taxes such as the PST and the GST are  important sources of revenue for governments. They are also regressive forms of  taxation because the poor have to spend a greater proportion of their income for  basic commodities such as food, clothing, transportation, etc., on which they  pay taxes. The percentage of a low income paid in sales taxes is thus much  higher than the percentage paid out of a large income.

User fees are the  most destructive form of taxation as far as the health of a community is  concerned. Those who support medicare premiums argue that the sick should pay  the costs of their own care; those who need
police, fire, ambulance services  should pay for them. The same people argue that university students should pay  higher tuition fees because the education benefits the students, forgetting that  we all depend on educated people to provide the services we need–legal,  information technology, doctors, lawyers, teachers, plumbers and electricians,  etc. In fact, our economy depends on educated people.

Parks and  recreational facilities promote good health; hence, if people have easy access  to these facilities the cost is offset by the saving in health  care.

Because the Federal Government has access to the largest and most  flexible tax base it is essential that it transfer a much larger share of  personal income and corporate taxes to the provinces and the municipalities.  Federal tax policy should be progressive and fair. Furthermore, there ought to  be a way of holding governments accountable to the public for expenditures.  There is a need for public debate on government income and expenditures.
–Verda Petry


Strategizing for Positive Aging in Saskatchewan

SSM Viewpoint - Can the Pandemic Lead to a Systemic Fix?


Entertainment Directory

SSM News !

Federal Election Checklist

Federal Election Checklist

How are federal parties planning to meet the needs and expectations of older adults? The checklist below will offer some of the questions that SSM is asking. Federal Election Checklist 2021

read more

Ageism in Saskatchewan Webinar

Is ageism a real thing? Should we be worried about it?  Are some people just too sensitive? How will I know if I support ageism or work to reduce it? Zoom recording of the Introduction to Ageism Webinar  

read more
Share This